diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'unused_chapters/mo.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | unused_chapters/mo.tex | 156 |
1 files changed, 156 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/unused_chapters/mo.tex b/unused_chapters/mo.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2a52bea --- /dev/null +++ b/unused_chapters/mo.tex @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +\documentclass{article} +\usepackage{tabularx,amsmath,boxedminipage,epsfig} +\begin{document} +\title{Millikan ``Oil Drop'' Experiment} +\author{} \date{} +\maketitle + \section*{Introduction and Theory} +Consider Fig. \ref{moplates} +\begin{figure}[h] +\centerline{\epsfig{width=3in, file=moplates.eps}} +\caption{\label{moplates}Very schematic Millikan Oil Drop System} +\end{figure} +It turns out that very small droplets fall very slowly. Clouds, for +example, are very small water droplets, trying to fall, but held aloft +by very slight air currents. + + +An electric field can take the place of the air current and +even cause the oil drop +to rise. Thus, for a rising oil drop: + +\begin{equation}\label{rise} +Eq=mg+kv_r +\end{equation} +where $E$ is the electric field, $q$ is the charge on the droplet, $m$ +is the mass of the droplet, $g$ is the acceleration due to gravity, $v_r$ +is the velocity rising, and $k$ is a drag coefficient which will be +related to the viscosity of air and the radius of the droplet. + +If the field is off and the droplet is just falling, then: +\begin{equation}\label{fall} +mg=kv_f +\end{equation} +Combining Eqs. \ref{rise} and \ref{fall} we can find the charge $q$: +\begin{equation}\label{q} +q=\frac{mg(v_f+v_r)}{Ev_f} +\end{equation} + + +The drag coefficient, $k$, can be determined from the viscosity, $\eta$, and +the radius of the droplet, $a$: + using Stokes law: +\begin{equation} +k=6\pi a\eta +\end{equation} + +Since +\begin{equation}\label{m} +m=\frac{4}{3}\pi a^3 \rho +\end{equation} +one may solve for $a$: +\begin{equation}\label{simple} +a=\sqrt{\frac{9\eta v_f}{2g\rho}} +\end{equation} +Here $rho=.886\cdot 10^3 kg/m^3$ is the density of the oil. (We ignore the +density of air, which is roughly 1/1000 less.) + +There is a +small correction because the oil drop radius is not so different +from the mean free path of air. This leads to an effective viscosity: +\begin{equation}\label{etaeff} +\eta_{eff}=\eta\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{pa}} +\end{equation} +where $b\approx 8.20 \times 10^{-3}$ (Pa m) and $p$ is atmospheric +pressure (1.01 $10^5$ Pa). The idea here is that the effect should be +related to the +ratio of the mean free path to the drop radius. This is the form +here since the mean free path is inversely proportional to pressure. +The particular numerical constant can be obtained experimentally if +the experiment were performed at several different pressures. A feature +Milikan's apparatus had, but ours does not. + +There are two approaches at this point that one could take. +\begin{enumerate} +\item One could use Eq. \ref{simple} to determine $a$ using an uncorrected +$\eta$, then use this to determine $\eta_{eff}$ then use this viscosity +in Eq. \ref{simple} again to find a somewhat better $a$, and then proceed +around the loop again until convergence is achieved. If the correction +is large, this can get tedious. + +\item Put $\eta_{eff}$ of Eq. \ref{etaeff} into Eq. \ref{simple} and +then solve this more complex equation for $a$. +\end{enumerate} +This second approach leads to: +\begin{equation}\label{complex} +a=\sqrt{\frac{9\eta v_f}{2g\rho}+\left(\frac{b}{2p}\right)^2}-\frac{b}{2p} +\end{equation} + +Having found $a$ one can then find $m$ using Eq. \ref{m} and then find +$q$ from Eq. \ref{q}. I would use this approach rather than the Pasco one. +Try to find drops that do not rise too quickly for they will likely have +a large number of electrons on them and, further, it will be difficult to +determine the $V_r$. If you can't find slow risers, then lower the voltage +so as to get better precision. Be sure to measure the space thickness in +order to determine the field from the voltage. + + + +\newpage\ + + + + +\subsection*{Required for your report}: + +Make a table of your measurements. Identify the drop and charge. +Determine the charge in each case. Make a table of charge differences. +Determine the smallest charge for which all the charges could be multiples +of this smallest charge. Estimate the error in your determination of e. + + Answer these questions somewhere in your report: + +\begin{enumerate} +\item You will notice that some drops travel upward and others downward + in the applied field. Why is this so? Why do some drops travel + very fast, and others slow? +\item Is the particle motion in a straight line? Or, do you notice that + the particle "dances" around ever so slightly? This is due to + Brownian motion: the random motion of a small particle in a gas or + fluid. + +\item Do you notice distinct steps in the terminal velocity in applied + field? That is, do the terminal velocities appear to clump around + similar values? What does this say about the discrete nature of + charge? + +\item We made three assumptions in determining the charge from Equation 1 + above. What are they? Hint: They are related to Stoke's Law. + +\item How does the average particle diameter you extracted from the + terminal velocity without the field on compare to the value given + on the bottle? Try to explain any discrepancies. + +\item Would you, like Millikan, spend 10 years on this experiment? + +\end{enumerate} + +Extra credit: Millikan and his contemporaries were only able to +measure integer values of electron charge (as you are). Has anyone +measured free charges of other than integer multiples of e? + + + + +\end{document} + + + + + + + + + + + |