summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEugeniy Mikhailov <evgmik@gmail.com>2014-10-07 10:46:59 -0400
committerEugeniy Mikhailov <evgmik@gmail.com>2014-10-07 10:46:59 -0400
commit47a3230bc261da7a6dff3c1c800adf64163c9066 (patch)
tree9c74ae2f6bcb423e1892ef3ca10ad89089d983ab
parenta66ecaf929dff80ba4a3bedb7fce91cc08f8d587 (diff)
downloadmanual_for_Experimental_Atomic_Physics-47a3230bc261da7a6dff3c1c800adf64163c9066.tar.gz
manual_for_Experimental_Atomic_Physics-47a3230bc261da7a6dff3c1c800adf64163c9066.zip
typos fixed, thanks to Kevin
-rw-r--r--single-photon-interference.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/single-photon-interference.tex b/single-photon-interference.tex
index 6354630..0527334 100644
--- a/single-photon-interference.tex
+++ b/single-photon-interference.tex
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ separated white light into its colors, and in the 1680's hypothesized that light
supposed to possess some properties of particles. This view reigned until the 1800's, when Thomas Young first
performed the two-slit experiment now known by his name. In this experiment he discovered a property of
destructive interference, which seemed impossible to explain in terms of corpuscles, but is very naturally
-explained in terms of waves. His experiment not only suggested that such 'light waves' existed; it also
+explained in terms of waves. His experiment not only suggested that such `light waves' existed; it also
provided a result that could be used to determine the wavelength of light, measured in familiar units. Light
waves became even more acceptable with dynamical theories of light, such as Fresnel's and Maxwell's, in the 19th
century, until it seemed that the wave theory of light was incontrovertible.
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ century, until it seemed that the wave theory of light was incontrovertible.
And yet the discovery of the photoelectric effect, and its explanation in terms of light quanta by Einstein,
threw the matter into dispute again. The explanations of blackbody radiation, of the photoelectric effect, and
-of the Compton effect seemed to point to the existence of 'photons', quanta of light that possessed definite and
+of the Compton effect seemed to point to the existence of `photons', quanta of light that possessed definite and
indivisible amounts of energy and momentum. These are very satisfactory explanations so far as they go, but
they throw into question the destructive-interference explanation of Young's experiment. Does light have a dual
nature, of waves and of particles? And if experiments force us to suppose that it does, how does the light know