From 2457b5cb03f163a9e6ed24331d707717cbb7a04c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugeniy Mikhailov <evgmik@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:23:18 -0400
Subject: typos fixed, thanks to Ashley

---
 blackbody.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'blackbody.tex')

diff --git a/blackbody.tex b/blackbody.tex
index e99ea18..c04b048 100644
--- a/blackbody.tex
+++ b/blackbody.tex
@@ -259,10 +259,10 @@ is true for a lamp.
 	between the sensor and lamp from 2.5-100 cm and record the sensor
 	reading. \textbf{Before the actual experiment think carefully about
 	at what distances you want to take the measurements. Is taking them
-	at constant intervals the optimal approach? At what distances you expect
+	at constant intervals the optimal approach? At what distances would you expect
 	the sensor reading change more rapidly?}
 
- \item  Make a plot of the corrected radiation measured from the lamp versus the inverse square of the distance from the lamp to the sensor $(1/x^2)$ and do a linear fit to the data.  How good is the fit? Is this data linear over the entire range of distances? Comment on any discrepancies. What is the uncertainty on the slope?  What intercept do you expect? Comment on these values and their uncertainties?
+ \item  Make a plot of the corrected radiation measured from the lamp versus the inverse square of the distance from the lamp to the sensor $(1/x^2)$ and do a linear fit to the data.  How good is the fit? Is this data linear over the entire range of distances? Comment on any discrepancies. What is the uncertainty on the slope?  What intercept do you expect? Comment on these values and their uncertainties.
 
 \item  Does radiation from the lamp follow the inverse square law? Can the lamp be considered a point source? If not, how could this affect your measurements?
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

