From f7a3cc75c9189a86637dba60e2dd20109140e31d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugeniy Mikhailov <evgmik@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:52:28 -0400
Subject: fix typos in comments

---
 xmds2/realistic_Rb/realistic_Rb.xmds | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'xmds2/realistic_Rb/realistic_Rb.xmds')

diff --git a/xmds2/realistic_Rb/realistic_Rb.xmds b/xmds2/realistic_Rb/realistic_Rb.xmds
index 5f7e437..75e7464 100644
--- a/xmds2/realistic_Rb/realistic_Rb.xmds
+++ b/xmds2/realistic_Rb/realistic_Rb.xmds
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 
 
 		We are solving 
-			dE/dz+(1/c)*dE/dt=i*eta*rho_ij,  where j level is higher then i.
+			dE/dz+(1/c)*dE/dt=i*eta*rho_ij,  where j level is higher than i.
 			Note that E is actually a Rabi frequency of electromagnetic field not the EM field
 		in xmds terms it looks like
 			dE_dz = i*eta*rhoij - 1/c*L[E], here we moved t dependence to Fourier space
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@
 		<integrate algorithm="ARK45" tolerance="1e-5" interval="Lcell"> 
 		<!--<integrate algorithm="SI" steps="200" interval="Lcell"> -->
 		<!--RK4 is good for large detunings when frequency like term are big, it does not try to be too smart about adaptive step which ARK seems to make too small-->
-		<!--When ARK45 works it about 3 times faster then RK4 with 1000 steps-->
+		<!--When ARK45 works it about 3 times faster than RK4 with 1000 steps-->
 		<!--<integrate algorithm="RK4" steps="100" interval="1.5e-2">-->
 		<!--SIC algorithm seems to be much slower and needs fine 'z'  step tuning and much finer time grid-->
 		<!--For example I had to quadruple the time grid from 1000 to 4000 when increased z distance from 0.02 to 0.04-->
-- 
cgit v1.2.3