From bd47477b43f6e5b2fd0b4d89b9933e5d8b26c342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugeniy Mikhailov <evgmik@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 14:21:03 -0500
Subject: Defaults back to mimic no Doppler broadening calculation script

---
 .../Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds                              | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds b/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds
index 99fe9ef..5045058 100644
--- a/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds
+++ b/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds
@@ -279,10 +279,10 @@
 	<sequence>
 		<!--For this set of conditions ARK45 is faster than ARK89-->
 		<!--ARK45 is good for small detuning when all frequency like term are close to zero-->
-		<integrate algorithm="ARK45" tolerance="1e-3" interval="1.5e-3"> 
+		<integrate algorithm="ARK45" tolerance="1e-5" interval="1.5e-2"> 
 		<!--RK4 is good for large detunings when frequency like term are big, it does not try to be too smart about adaptive step which ARK seems to make too small-->
 		<!--When ARK45 works it about 3 times faster then RK4 with 1000 steps-->
-		<!--<integrate algorithm="RK4" steps="100" interval="1.5e-3">-->
+		<!--<integrate algorithm="RK4" steps="100" interval="1.5e-2">-->
 		<!--SIC algorithm seems to be much slower and needs fine 'z'  step tuning and much finer time grid-->
 		<!--For example I had to quadruple the time grid from 1000 to 4000 when increased z distance from 0.02 to 0.04-->
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3