From 199dc4eea69d59ef3a5642be1b7c44af65d14e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugeniy Mikhailov <evgmik@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 23:55:41 -0500
Subject: RK -> ARK solver

---
 .../Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds                              | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds b/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds
index 9752cc4..3640f62 100644
--- a/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds
+++ b/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds
@@ -256,10 +256,10 @@
 	<sequence>
 		<!--For this set of conditions ARK45 is faster than ARK89-->
 		<!--ARK45 is good for small detuning when all frequency like term are close to zero-->
-		<!--<integrate algorithm="ARK45" tolerance="1e-5" interval="1.5e-2">--> 
+		<integrate algorithm="ARK45" tolerance="1e-3" interval="1.5e-3"> 
 		<!--RK4 is good for large detunings when frequency like term are big, it does not try to be too smart about adaptive step which ARK seems to make too small-->
 		<!--When ARK45 works it about 3 times faster then RK4 with 1000 steps-->
-		<integrate algorithm="RK4" steps="100" tolerance="1e-5" interval="1.5e-3">
+		<!--<integrate algorithm="RK4" steps="100" interval="1.5e-3">-->
 		<!--SIC algorithm seems to be much slower and needs fine 'z'  step tuning and much finer time grid-->
 		<!--For example I had to quadruple the time grid from 1000 to 4000 when increased z distance from 0.02 to 0.04-->
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3