diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'xmds2')
| -rw-r--r-- | xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds b/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds index 99fe9ef..5045058 100644 --- a/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds +++ b/xmds2/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm/Nlevels_with_doppler_with_z_4wm.xmds @@ -279,10 +279,10 @@ <sequence> <!--For this set of conditions ARK45 is faster than ARK89--> <!--ARK45 is good for small detuning when all frequency like term are close to zero--> - <integrate algorithm="ARK45" tolerance="1e-3" interval="1.5e-3"> + <integrate algorithm="ARK45" tolerance="1e-5" interval="1.5e-2"> <!--RK4 is good for large detunings when frequency like term are big, it does not try to be too smart about adaptive step which ARK seems to make too small--> <!--When ARK45 works it about 3 times faster then RK4 with 1000 steps--> - <!--<integrate algorithm="RK4" steps="100" interval="1.5e-3">--> + <!--<integrate algorithm="RK4" steps="100" interval="1.5e-2">--> <!--SIC algorithm seems to be much slower and needs fine 'z' step tuning and much finer time grid--> <!--For example I had to quadruple the time grid from 1000 to 4000 when increased z distance from 0.02 to 0.04--> |